That's great news, I was happy to see that when I thought of the same thing, someone had already put it into the works. I think these types of "grades" for prospects are much more valuable to the reader than the 1-10 scale shown on the front page. I don't think that really adds much value in terms of comparing prospects because they change pretty often and it seems that a number of different players have the same ratings while it's pretty clear that they don't have the same prospect value.