Login
ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 198
01/25/12 10:32 PM
mredsox89 wrote:Former Sox prospect Dustin Richardson suspended for 50 games for violation of substance abuse policy. Testing positive for everything under the sun and more. "Amphetamine, Letrozole and metabolite, Methandienone metabolite, Methenelone and metabolite, and Trenbolone and metabolite" according to Extra Bases.
Interact
Posts: 4090
01/26/12 12:12 AM
Veteran Member
Am Dominican and you??
Posts: 315
01/26/12 12:36 AM
Posts: 318
01/26/12 1:43 AM
BOSTON -- The calendar, with spring training less than a month away, gives you every reason to believe the Red Sox will soon be adding another starting pitcher.
If they do not succeed in signing Roy Oswalt, to whom they have made an offer, a team source said Wednesday night, they most likely will shift their focus to trying to swing a deal with theChicago White Sox for right-hander Gavin Floyd, with free agent pitcher Edwin Jackson a long-shot option at this stage.
http://espn.go.com/boston...t-al-strengthen-rotation
Posts: 3486
01/26/12 2:31 AM
Posts: 229
01/26/12 10:27 AM
Archie Graham wrote:Yep, this is all setting up nicely for the Sox to fail in landing a pitcher while conveniently getting under the tax. Oswalt doesn't want to pitch here. Jackson is now a "longshot" ...but the Red Sox will make a trade for Gavin Floyd. And once we hear that Kenny Williams demands are crazy, management can wrap up their successful plan to dupe the fan base and get under the tax. "We can still find opportunities during the season". I have zero faith that any of this is true. I'll be shocked if they land any of these guys.
Posts: 590
01/26/12 11:30 AM
Posts: 101
01/26/12 2:40 PM
Posts: 908
01/26/12 4:54 PM
Posts: 230
01/26/12 7:58 PM
RedSox0407Champs wrote:If Oswalt doesn't want to come to Boston and the choice is signing Jackson to a multi-year deal or overpaying for Floyd, then I'd just as well do none of the above and hope that Padilla can hold the fort until Daisuke comes back.I've been pretty clear about my desire for the Sox to strengthen their pitching rotation, but I see no need to enter into another questionable long-term contract with someone like Jackson (apparently Baltimore and another team are rumored to be willing to give Jackson multiple years), nor do I see a need to overpay for Floyd, who's alright, but really wouldn't be anything special.If those are the choices, then I'd opt for none of the above. The real prize is Oswalt. I'm hoping that the Cards aren't willing to spend and that Texas decides they don't need to add a 7th starter (although Ogando is apparently heading for the pen). I mean, they spent all that money on Nathan to close so Feliz can start. It wouldn't make sense for them to reverse that? Would it? Maybe they'd move somebody else to the pen (like Harrison?)?
01/26/12 10:36 PM
Any idea why the Phils aren't interested in Oswalt at what I assume is a lowered price?@angryelvis on Twitter
That Roy Oswalt remains unsigned on Jan. 25 qualifies as the least surprising development of the winter for me. His agent was trying to sell people on a three-year deal in November, lied about a proposed meeting with the Yankees in New York, and probably misrepresented Oswalt's desire to play for that long.
Most likely, some teams interested in Oswalt have asked Phillies people for their opinion on the righthander who made $16 million in 2011. The Phillies won't say such a thing publicly, but there are serious concerns about Oswalt's back holding up for an entire season, let alone three more. Now the asking price is reportedly down to one year and there still are no obvious suitors. Plus, Edwin Jackson is still out there and he's six years younger than Oswalt.
The fact is, Oswalt probably only wants to pitch for a select group of teams. (Hint, hint: St. Louis.) People have said there's no such thing as a bad one-year contract. But it would take a lot of faith for a team to invest money in Oswalt, who mentally and physically wasn't always there in 2011.
Posts: 596
01/27/12 12:10 PM
Posts: 1670
01/27/12 3:05 PM
Posts: 1685
01/27/12 3:25 PM
DCRi wrote:The more I have thought about it the less I care whether the Sox add any of the pitchers now being discussed. Assuming that Oswalt never will be the pitcher he once was, none of them is a difference-maker. Floyd would be a decent add, but the price might be a little high, and the Sox farm system isn't that strong now.I think that it may not be a great tragedy if the Sox go into the season with the pitchers they have, and see who becomes available as the trade deadline nears.
Posts: 3487
01/27/12 5:03 PM
Posts: 597
01/27/12 5:15 PM
Posts: 1686
01/27/12 5:21 PM
Archie Graham wrote:If you don't get a (quality) starting pitcher in the offseason, then don't expect to fill the hole during the season. The "save money and make a trade during the season" approach sounds nice, until teams are asking you for three top 10 prospects for their mediocre pitcher. What we break spring training with is what we will have for the season.
Posts: 248
01/27/12 6:23 PM
Posts: 389
01/27/12 6:40 PM
Steve of Charlotte wrote:Figuring with some extra inning games, we need to be able to cover around 1500 innings. Our starters may not reach 900, let alone 1000 (5x200). Lets figure Beckett gives us 195, Lester 210, Buchholtz 180, Bard 150, and the 5th starter 150 (Cook, Padilla, Dice-K etc.), that only gives us 885.Of course I'm (praying) for good health. Bailey 60, Melanson 70, and (old faithful) Aceves 100....somewhere we need to cover close to 385 MORE innings.Archie is probably correct, we need some more insurance by adding someone now.No way can we count on Andrew Miller. Morales may give us 60. Our starters, to me, look like the problem. I'm pulling hard Felix Doubront!!!
Posts: 1894
01/27/12 6:41 PM
Senior Forum Moderator
Greek God of Pankakes wrote:More competition in Pawtucket:John Maine
Share This