Login
ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 2285
11/18/11 8:34 AM
adiospaydro2005 wrote:chavopepe2 wrote:That isn't the point of moving the Astros to the AL - that is a consequence. If they make it an even 15 teams in each league then you will have to have an NL team play an AL team everyday.This is so stupid going from 18 to 30 inter-league games with different rules, as well as having the games throughout the year.
chavopepe2 wrote:That isn't the point of moving the Astros to the AL - that is a consequence. If they make it an even 15 teams in each league then you will have to have an NL team play an AL team everyday.
Interact
Posts: 2543
11/18/11 10:57 AM
Posts: 3279
11/18/11 11:00 AM
Veteran Member
BriantheTaoist wrote:"Interleague" play is just fundamentally stupid. Either you have two different leagues, or you don't. Call them conferences like every other sport if you want them playing each other all the time, get rid of the entire concept of two different leagues, normalize the rules, and go from there.
BriantheTaoist wrote:Now, I disagree with the whole idea of it and would much rather they get rid of the interleague games completely, mind you. I think it's basically unfair to have divisional races affected by the relative strength of the teams' interleague opponents.
Posts: 3660
11/18/11 12:15 PM
Posts: 3280
11/18/11 1:37 PM
Posts: 3972
11/18/11 1:45 PM
FenwayTheHardWay wrote:So who thinks that the 92 win Angels/Twins deserved a chance play an elimination game against the 98 win Red Sox in '04? And yes, I understand that the current 3 + 1 wildcard system isn't necessarily perfect either. But the single elimination game stuff is just stupid; it's not a solution to anything.
Am Dominican and you??
Posts: 279
11/18/11 1:50 PM
Posts: 224
11/18/11 1:53 PM
Posts: 3281
11/18/11 2:10 PM
Posts: 1432
11/18/11 2:19 PM
Posts: 1433
11/18/11 2:33 PM
norbit14 wrote:FenwayTheHardWay wrote:So who thinks that the 92 win Angels/Twins deserved a chance play an elimination game against the 98 win Red Sox in '04? And yes, I understand that the current 3 + 1 wildcard system isn't necessarily perfect either. But the single elimination game stuff is just stupid; it's not a solution to anything.I agree with you.One other thing. The finish to to this season was awesome, not for the Sox but in general, this eliminates the chances of this happening again.
Posts: 3973
11/18/11 2:41 PM
Posts: 1434
11/18/11 3:30 PM
Posts: 3283
11/18/11 4:06 PM
Curll84 wrote:Except for the fact that this -- EXACT -- scenario would have taken place should the Red Sox beat the O's. A one-game playoff.
Posts: 1435
11/18/11 5:41 PM
FenwayTheHardWay wrote:Curll84 wrote:Except for the fact that this -- EXACT -- scenario would have taken place should the Red Sox beat the O's. A one-game playoff. Nonsense. A one game playoff makes sense when two teams have played to a stalemate over 162. It doesn't when one of the teams has clearly proven itself to be superior over a 162 game series.
Posts: 280
11/18/11 7:01 PM
Curll84 wrote:FenwayTheHardWay wrote: Nonsense. A one game playoff makes sense when two teams have played to a stalemate over 162. It doesn't when one of the teams has clearly proven itself to be superior over a 162 game series.Then why even have playoffs? Or a World Series? Does a Game 7 also cheapen the regular season? Come off of it. It really is an illogical, obsolete idea. This increases the chances of teams making money and adds more drama to the final few weeks of September. Motivates teams to win the division or face the stupid chance of missing the playoffs because of one game. There is literally no downside.
FenwayTheHardWay wrote: Nonsense. A one game playoff makes sense when two teams have played to a stalemate over 162. It doesn't when one of the teams has clearly proven itself to be superior over a 162 game series.
Posts: 154
11/18/11 7:15 PM
Posts: 3975
11/18/11 7:26 PM
Posts: 1897
11/18/11 9:24 PM
Soler is an athletic, 6-foot-3 outfielder who can play center field but will likely end up as a corner outfielder. His high upside and potential to hit for power has made him a player coveted by a gaggle of teams. “He’s got a Hanley Ramirez-type body,” Nationals Director of International Scouting Johnny DiPuglia said. “Plus arm. Plus bat speed. He’s a good kid, a good-energy kid.” The Nationals, Yankees, Cubs and Rangers are among the teams who have shown the most significant interest in Soler. People familiar with the situation expect Soler to sign a contract similar to, but likely richer than, the three-year, $15.5 million deal the Texas Rangers gave Cuban center fielder Leonys Martin.
Soler is an athletic, 6-foot-3 outfielder who can play center field but will likely end up as a corner outfielder. His high upside and potential to hit for power has made him a player coveted by a gaggle of teams.
“He’s got a Hanley Ramirez-type body,” Nationals Director of International Scouting Johnny DiPuglia said. “Plus arm. Plus bat speed. He’s a good kid, a good-energy kid.”
The Nationals, Yankees, Cubs and Rangers are among the teams who have shown the most significant interest in Soler. People familiar with the situation expect Soler to sign a contract similar to, but likely richer than, the three-year, $15.5 million deal the Texas Rangers gave Cuban center fielder Leonys Martin.
Posts: 93
11/18/11 11:16 PM
Share This