Login
ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 257
12/13/09 9:36 PM
Interact
Posts: 20
12/13/09 10:04 PM
Sibby Sisti wrote: Lithuanian Soxfan wrote: Atkins is totally a product of Coors Field, and he has been in decline for more than a year ... Career: Home: .327 / .385 / .507 Road: .252 / .324 / .411 2009: .226/.308/.342 2008: .286/.328/.452 2007: .301/.367/.486 2006: .329/.409/.557 I agree Beltre may become cost prohibitive, but LaRoche would probably be a better option than Atkins, IMHO. Still no explanation as to why he's "done". If you want to consider a 21hr, 99 rbi, .286 season as the start of a "decline" have at it. The guy is no Brooks Robinson, but I'd rather him for short money than Beltre at the inflated figure Boris' is demanding. Besides Beltre would want three years minimum. You could get Atkins for a year or two until a better option opens at either third or first.
Lithuanian Soxfan wrote: Atkins is totally a product of Coors Field, and he has been in decline for more than a year ... Career: Home: .327 / .385 / .507 Road: .252 / .324 / .411 2009: .226/.308/.342 2008: .286/.328/.452 2007: .301/.367/.486 2006: .329/.409/.557 I agree Beltre may become cost prohibitive, but LaRoche would probably be a better option than Atkins, IMHO.
Posts: 719
12/13/09 10:51 PM
Lithuanian Soxfan wrote: Declines always have to start somewhere. And I would argue that the decline started the year before the season you are indicating. As well, RBIs aren't a great stat to review for this - they are too dependant on the rest of the team. For the season you are describing, I would be more tempted to look at the 21 home runs from a corner infielder position in Coors Field. That's nothing to brag about. But most importantly, all his key counting stats have dropped significantly three years in a row. That's a decline; and that's why he was non-tendered.
Posts: 1536
12/13/09 10:53 PM
Obviously, the Sox's pursuits of Beltre and Johnson hinge on their pending trade of third baseman Mike Lowell to the Rangers. Lowell is expected to undergo a physical in Texas sometime this week.
Posts: 15144
12/13/09 11:08 PM
Veteran Member
Posts: 384
12/14/09 10:42 AM
mike Lowell may require thumb surgery because of years of ever playing hard and diving for balls. doesn't deserve it
Posts: 3522
12/14/09 10:46 AM
Posts: 714
12/14/09 11:26 AM
Posts: 3523
12/14/09 11:37 AM
Posts: 84
12/14/09 11:48 AM
Pete MorrisonWiki EditorSoxProspects.com
Posts: 4
12/14/09 12:09 PM
Posts: 1538
12/14/09 12:18 PM
redsoxdiehard30 wrote: The only way I want the Sox to trade Lowell for Ramirez is if he is flipped for a stud OF that could play LF (ie Werth). I think Lowell is better than anyone we can sign (Beltre, Tejada, etc) so I have a hard time seeing the need to trade him so quickly when he is our best option at 3B.
Posts: 7351
12/14/09 12:25 PM
Mike Andrews Editor-in-ChiefSoxProspects.com
Posts: 49
12/14/09 12:48 PM
How do the rangers plan on using Mike Lowell?
Lots of Lowell questions, so let me sum the situation up here:As for the trade, nothing is final. As we've said it's something both teams are looking at and the parameters are generally understood. Still some things to work through though, and it's not a lock to happen. I expect resolution one way or the other fairly soon.If we did acquire Mike, he'd fill several roles for us. He's DH at times, play 1B at times, and give us a strong option at 3B if Mike Young needed a day or had an injury. Some of the more potent bats available for the DH spot are attractive too, but we really wanted to maintain roster flexibility and have our DH be able to play defense when needed. Depth and interchangeable parts are so important over the course of 162... He also brings an element of experience that can only help.
It took him a long time to answer that question.
Posts: 3991
12/14/09 3:26 PM
Posts: 726
12/14/09 3:39 PM
WillyCoPapi3 wrote: I really don't want to hate Mike Lowell, but if his thumb impedes this trade from happening I might have to.
Posts: 1568
12/14/09 5:08 PM
Posts: 1732
12/14/09 6:58 PM
Yirmiyahu wrote: WillyCoPapi3 wrote: I really don't want to hate Mike Lowell, but if his thumb impedes this trade from happening I might have to. Should've gone the Bill Mueller route. Let him have a couple of great seasons, and then said "take care" and let him walk.
Posts: 205
12/15/09 3:36 PM
Matt HuegelSenior EditorSoxProspects.com
#Rangers "possibly" on Dye or Guerrero even if they get Lowell. Depends on $$$. Source: Lowell chances better than 50-50 but not a lock.
Posts: 753
12/15/09 3:45 PM
Mhueg wrote: #Rangers "possibly" on Dye or Guerrero even if they get Lowell. Depends on $$$. Source: Lowell chances better than 50-50 but not a lock. Rosenthal Tweet
Share This