Login
ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 307
09/09/09 3:36 PM
Interact
Posts: 146
09/09/09 10:36 PM
Contributing Photographer
Pinkerton Baseball
Posts: 2871
09/09/09 11:25 PM
Veteran Member
Posts: 3615
09/10/09 1:59 AM
Beat UM and UF wrote: I liked Talladega Nights a lot too.
ASAL owns this thread. Owns it. - Arquimedez Bozo
Posts: 2907
09/10/09 3:28 AM
Posts: 2872
09/10/09 4:04 PM
Posts: 2427
09/10/09 9:35 PM
Posts: 196
09/11/09 1:52 AM
DonCaballero wrote: Oh, and Anchorman sucks, pretty much any movie with Will Ferrell sucked and any movie with Ben Stiller that it's not Royal Tenanbaums sucked as well.
Posts: 2873
09/11/09 2:13 AM
Posts: 1494
09/11/09 3:39 AM
Posts: 60
09/11/09 10:01 PM
Posts: 199
09/11/09 11:11 PM
nomore nomar 5 wrote: 1. Billy Madison- either you love or hate Sandler.
Posts: 1500
09/12/09 12:18 AM
WHERE'S THE MONEY, LEBOWSKI? Let's start with Lebowski's brilliance as a detective story. Lebowski presents us with a Big Sleep-style mystery: What Happened To The Kidnapped Heiress? But the kidnapping plot, we eventually find, is a gigantic red herring. The real mystery in The Big Lebowski is Where's The Money? This is not an idle plot-point, it is a key subtext to understanding the importance of the movie. The kidnapped girl is a worthless idiot of importance to no one, but the money, ah, the money, as Mose in Hudsucker would say, "drives that ol' global economy and keeps big Daddy Earth a-spinnin' on 'roun'." The Big Lebowski is a social critique disguised as a mystery disguised as a stoner comedy. The key to understanding the social dynamics of The Big Lebowski is to always follow the money. So where is "the money" in The Big Lebowski? ("Where's the money, Lebowski?" is, in fact, the movie's first line of dialogue.) The Dude doesn't have it -- he lives in a crappy Venice bungalow and is late on his rent. His friend Walter has his own business, but doesn't have any appreciable amount of it. Jeffrey Lebowski, despite appearances, doesn't have it, and his wife Bunny obviously doesn't have it. The Nihilists don't have it and neither does Larry Sellers, even though Walter is positive he has it. The joke is, of course, that no one has it -- "the money" belonged to the first Mrs. Lebowski, who is long dead. We don't know how Mrs. Lebowski got her money -- "Capital," the source of "the money" in The Big Lebowski, is nebulous and taken for granted. "The Money" is like "The Gold" in Eric Von Stroheim's Greed -- it's not something to be earned, it's almost a natural resource, something that's just sitting around waiting for someone to figure out how to get it. Who has any money in The Big Lebowski? Maud Lebowski, Jeffrey's daughter, the aggressively "feminist" artist, has some money, but even that is not hers, it's her mother's. She hasn't earned it and seems to be frittering it away on ugly art and an inane lifestyle (the other artist presented in Lebowski is The Dude's landlord, with his stupefying Greek Modern Dance routine -- art doesn't seem to count for much in the Lebowski universe). The only other wealthy personage in Lebowski is Jackie Treehorn, the pornographer. So: in the world of The Big Lebowski, "Money" is represented by an embezzler, an heir and a pornographer -- as harsh a critique of American capitalism as I've ever heard. Everyone else is barely scraping by or actively losing money hand over fist. The indignities heaped upon The Dude in this narrative are great: his house is repeatedly broken into ("Hey, Man, this is a private residence" he lazily chides a trio of armed thugs), his possessions are smashed until nothing is left of them, his car is shot at, crashed, stolen, crashed again, peed in, bashed and finally set fire to. He is punched unconscious, drugged and hit with a coffee mug. The Rich in Lebowski get richer by soaking the Poor, and every transaction between social unequals is a heartbeat away from physical violence. Even Maud, who only wants her rug back, can't resist using force upon The Dude in order to get what she wants. (The other thing Maud wants, of course, is to conceive a child. This is a succinct reversal of the argument of Raising Arizona. In the earlier movie, Ed reasoned that the Arizonas [The Rich] deserved to lose a child so that she [The Poor] could have one. In Lebowski, Maud [The Rich] assumes that it is her right to use The Dude [The Poor] as a method to get her own child -- in both movies, children are merely another expression of capital [or, as the Dude complains about pornographer Jackie Treehorn, "he treats objects as people, man.")
Things seem to've worked out pretty good for the Dude'n Walter, and it was a purt good story, dontcha think? Made me laugh to beat the band. Parts, anyway. Course--I didn't like seein' Donny go. But then, happen to know that there's a little Lebowski on the way. I guess that's the way the whole durned human comedy keeps perpetuatin' it-self, down through the generations, westward the wagons, across the sands a time until-- aw, look at me, I'm ramblin' again."
"Gatsby believed in the green light, the orgastic future that year by year recedes before us. It eluded us then, but that's no matter--tomorrow we will run faster, stretch out our arms farther. . . . And one fine morning---- So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past."
Posts: 14893
09/12/09 2:30 PM
Posts: 325
09/12/09 7:06 PM
templeUsox wrote: The Big Lebowski went from underrated to overrated in light speed.
Posts: 1506
09/12/09 9:57 PM
Posts: 14894
09/12/09 10:25 PM
Posts: 3628
09/12/09 10:45 PM
templeUsox wrote: I'll say this, TBL is a better movie than it is a comedy.
Posts: 1507
09/12/09 11:35 PM
templeUsox wrote: I don't keep lists of these types of things and I don't feel like combing through imdb to figure out one. If you want to make a list of movies, I'll tell which ones I think are funnier. I'll say this, TBL is a better movie than it is a comedy.
Posts: 14898
09/13/09 12:17 AM
Share This