Player of the Week 8/24-8/30 in Poll Archives Forum

0 Points

Player of the Week 8/24-8/30

Author	Comment
Arquimedez Bozo	Player of the Week 8/24-8/30		Lead	[-]
Posts: 8390 08/31/09 12:40 AM Chris Hatfield Executive Editor SoxProspects.com	Tags : None Vote for your pick for Player of the Week below based on performance (and not prospect status), and discuss your choice in the thread. Who was last week's Player of the Week? (Total Votes: 86) - Closed DH/LF Chih-Hsien Chiang (Sal) - 7 G/6 GS, 22 PA, 18 AB, 8 H, 6 2B, 5 RBI, 4 R, 4 BB, 2 K, .444/.545/.778 (38 / 44.2%) C Luis Exposito (Por) - 5 G, 21 PA, 18 AB, 7 H, 3 2B, 1 HR, 2 RBI, 2 R, 2 BB, 6 K, 1 SB, 1 HBP, 2 ERR, 1 PB, .389/.476/.722 (7 / 8.1%) RF/LF Alex Hassan (Gre/Low) - 6 G, 27 PA, 25 AB, 9 H, 3 2B, 1 3B, 1 HR, 5 RBI, 5 R, 2 BB, 3 K, 1 OF ASST, .360/.407/.680 (Sent from Greenville (5 G) to Lowell (1 G)) (3 / 3.5%) CF/RF/LF Pete Hissey (Gre) - 5 G, 26 PA, 23 AB, 12 H, 3 2B, 2 RBI, 5 R, 1 BB, 2 K, 2 HBP, 1 SB, 2 CS, .522/.577/.652 (26 / 30.2%) LF/DH Daniel Nava (Por) - 8 G, 36 PA, 32 AB, 14 H, 5 2B, 5 RBI, 7 R, 4 BB, 3 K, 1 ERR, .438/.500/.594 (12 / 14%)
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
tdrowe		#1	[url]	[-]
Veteran Member Posts: 1004 08/31/09 1:11 AM	Pete Hissey - Rakist.
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
toolerawk		#2	[url]	[-]
Rookie Posts: 37 08/31/09 1:48 AM	Tough one between Nava and Hissey but went with Hissey. Could have picked either way. Let me pull on your coat about something here tonight...
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
Yirmiyahu		#3	[url]	[-]
Posts: 457 08/31/09 1:59 AM Forum Moderator	I love how Nava's a strong candidate for player of the week, yet his numbers this week are pulling down his OBP and SLG totals in Portland. ADD: For the record, voted for Hissey. Last Edited By: Yirmiyahu 08/31/09 12:14 PM. Edited 1 time.
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
templeUsox		#4	[url]	[-]
Posts: 14837 08/31/09 2:08 AM Veteran Member Podcast Panelist	Keep sleeping on Chiang...
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
DonCaballero		#5	[url]	[-]
Veteran Member Posts: 282 08/31/09 3:17 AM	I want to vote for Chiang, but I'm more impressed with how Hassan didn't look overmatched at Greenville.
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
drivfan08		#6	[url]	[-]
Veteran Member Posts: 191 08/31/09 7:02 AM Contributing Photographer	DonCaballero wrote: I'm more impressed with how Hassan didn't look overmatched at Greenville. Although Chris didn't have the numbers that Alex had, both of these guys looked good while in Greenville before being sent down. I look forward to seeing them next year. Iglesias (from Adam Foster): # Just saw Iglesias miss a grounder for the first time ever. A two-headed albino alligator was conceived simultaneously.
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
ancientsoxfogey		#7	[url]	[-]
Veteran Member Posts: 4193 08/31/09 7:21 AM Veteran Member	At least now we're getting a full slate of offensive players with OPS well over 1.000 for the week. That is the way it should be when the system as a whole is hitting at least adequately -- the hottest hitters should be at this level.
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
jsinger121		#8	[url]	[-]
Posts: 15336 08/31/09 7:37 AM Jonathan Singer Digital Correspondent SoxProspects.com	Tough to overlook Chiang's slugging this week. Twitter: @Jonathan_Singer/@Soxprospects
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
Arquimedez Bozo		#9	[url]	[-]
Posts: 8398 08/31/09 8:39 AM Chris Hatfield Executive Editor SoxProspects.com	Anyone who voted for Nava or Exposito want to explain their reasoning? Again, I'm not calling you out - I'm curious because I can't think of how to justify it. And before anyone says "well Nava had 14 hits!", note that he had at least 9 more plate appearances than anyone else on the list.
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
joshv02		#10	[url]	[-]
Veteran Member Posts: 198 08/31/09 10:50 AM	Chiang. AB: but almost went with Hissey b/c of greater PAs (with sustained success) and positional adjustment, and almost picked Nava because of level of competition. Greater PAs isn't a bad thing - it gives more opportunies for hits, but also more opportunities for outs. More hits with a high BA just means a greater sample size. Who could say that another player would have sustained the level of success over a greater sample size? Expo is a reasonable pick if you consider position and level of competition in your voting. Last Edited By: joshv02 08/31/09 11:23 AM. Edited 1 time.
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
Arquimedez Bozo		#11	[url]	[-]
Posts: 8401 08/31/09 5:42 PM Chris Hatfield Executive Editor SoxProspects.com	joshv02 wrote: Chiang. AB: but almost went with Hissey b/c of greater PAs (with sustained success) and positional adjustment, and almost picked Nava because of level of competition. Greater PAs isn't a bad thing - it gives more opportunies for hits, but also more opportunities for outs. More hits with a high BA just means a greater sample size. Who could say that another player would have sustained the level of success over a greater sample size? Expo is a reasonable pick if you consider position and level of competition in your voting. I get the position thing with Expo, but at that point wouldn't you factor in the 2 errors and passed ball? As for Nava, I get it if he had sustained a certain level, but his rates are far below those of other guys on there. To each their own I guess. Not worried, just was curious.
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
joshv02		#12	[url]	[-]
Veteran Member Posts: 199 08/31/09 7:07 PM	Nava: Yeah, but his sustained success created more runs. Looking at basic RCs: Nava: 9.5 Hissey: 8.7 Chiang: 7.6 Hassan: 6.9 Expo: 6.2 Expo: Well, yeah, but, well, yeah.
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
charliezink16		#13	[url]	[-]
Veteran Member Posts: 165 08/31/09 9:57 PM	Suprise to see Chiang leading this vote, I considered Nava and Hissey first. Especially considering the amount of AB's Nava got.
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
Arquimedez Bozo		#14	[url]	[-]
Posts: 8404 08/31/09 9:59 PM Chris Hatfield Executive Editor SoxProspects.com	joshv02 wrote: Nava: Yeah, but his sustained success created more runs. Looking at basic RCs: Nava: 9.5 Hissey: 8.7 Chiang: 7.6 Hassan: 6.9 Expo: 6.2 See, this is the kind of thing I was looking for. Here's what FR9's RC actually has: Nava 10.0 Hissey 8.2 Hassan 7.1 Chiang 6.2 Exposito 6.1
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
TokenWilliams		#15	[url]	[-]
Veteran Member Posts: 428 09/01/09 10:05 AM	Chiang... but it was an interesting decision... Hissy i didn't take because his legs are what are important to him and he was only 1 of 3 in SB attempts... basically he ran himself into outs twice on the base paths which negate his hits... Also, his slugging was good, but it was made up of basically all singles... he did have 3 2b's, but that's just not enough when getting caught twice... i do like the week just not over Chiangs.. Exposito had too many errors and passed balls for my liking. Offensively, he was right there, but in a tiebreaker he gets down graded for those things Nava was also a good choice, but I liked Chiang better... I particularly liked how Chiang had 4BB/2k's... I still believe Chiang is going to be heard from within the next couple years as a prospect for the Red Sox... I like his bat
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
Sibby Sisti		#16	[url]	[-]
Veteran Member Posts: 234 09/01/09 10:48 AM	I went with Nava primarily because he had considerably more plate appearances and games than the other candidates and managed a .438BA. He is an interesting study, a Johnny - come - lately. He's 26, so his ceiling is not as high as the younger prospects. But he sure can hit a baseball. I'll be following him next year, hoping he doesn't have a "Bell" season.
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
back2basix3593		#17	[url]	[-]
Veteran Member Posts: 24 09/01/09 3:59 PM	How is Expo getting votes ,he was the first one that I eliminated
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote